January 23, 2008     Some thoughts about monitors

This is another “what-if” type of post.

Monitors, in general, are getting bigger, and screen resolution is getting higher. (For example, the monitor I’m writing this on right now is 1920×1200 pixels.) The 800×600 screen is largely a thing of the past, relegated to technophobes and poor school districts — the rest of us seem to have readily moved on.

If monitors keep getting bigger, what new design challenges might that bring? Instead of struggling to cram too much functionality into too little space, might interface designers start facing the opposite problem, of being able to expose all of the functionality when maybe they shouldn’t? I could imagine it becoming a larger effort to direct and manage the user’s attention appropriately.

Let’s take an extreme example. What if monitors that were 3 feet diagonal became commonplace?

I’m willing to bet that full screen mode would become something very different. Even on my 24-inch monitor, I almost never use an application full-screen; it becomes too big of an area to look at. If I expand a website, it becomes hard to read. Instead, I use the extra space to layer auxiliary programs and windows (iTunes, AIM, the Dock, tool palettes, etc.) so that they are available without any extra effort.

I could imagine a program that really needs your focus having to dim or blank out other parts of the screen. Would full screen mode then mean that only part of the monitor gets used, only as much as we can take in at one glance?

Or maybe single screens start taking on some of the capabilities that multiple monitors have now. Maybe you get the ability to define different areas of the screen and assign different programs to them, the way people have email on one screen and do work in the other. So the monitor stops being a unified space and starts to become a segmented group of areas - like multiple desktops on Linux, but simultaneously present.

Of course, that gets into a whole different windowing system. Could you expand and collapse different spaces? How would you arrange them?

Alright, my brain’s starting to hurt. And even with all that, I still wonder about the effect on people’s attention. In order to combat information overload, I’ll bet programs will have to find a way to say, “Pay attention to me, and not anything else,” when the users need them to. In fact, that could become the biggest challenge of all.

2 Comments »

  1. I tend to full screen everything. This might be because I primarily use windows or windows-like window manager (Gnome/KDE) in linux, since I’ve noticed that people who use OSX far more frequently don’t full screen (well maximize, osx is funny about fullscreen) windows, instead having windows floating around their desktop. When I heavily used linux, I got really used to using multiple desktops, which was really nice. It could be just a habit I have yet to break since I got used to it back in the day.

    As far as program notifications go, I know my chat client (Pidgin) will flash on my task bar (similar to how icons bounce on the OSX dock). I imagine if we started using segregated workspace that have customized dimensions, there’d be some sort of interface that allowed you to see a list of open workspaces, and in that you could call user attention to ones in which there is new or updated information. It might require that programs throw update calls, so maybe it’d really come about with co-operation between application developers and the people that design the OS interface. Maybe we’ll see some innovation like this with Windows 7 (although I really doubt it)

    Comment by Tom — January 25, 2008 @ 3:42 am

  2. Interesting thoughts. I would think there’s a practical limit to the size of the general population’s monitors. Sure, newspapers and magazines could make their paper much bigger… but then it gets less usable, more physically awkward, and tougher to read/digest all the information.

    Comment by Jody — January 28, 2008 @ 2:09 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment